Ben Kevan’s Blog

I voted no. Although I like YaST, I just think Mandriva and PCLinux OS (among others) have powerful “Control Panels” making it pointless to replace them with YaST. I think distros should remain varied, and cater to different users with different preferences in computing.

I also voted no.
coz Yast is not as good as APT ,i thought.
epecially when u wanna remove or install some package,the speed is much lower than APT. saying in another way,APT package management system should be ported to other distro.
And I heard Redhat is approach porting APT to Redhat.

i voted no! yast is yet on GPL, and if others didn’t ported it to theyre distro means that they DON’T WHANT or they are NOT ABLE to do that…

port yast to others distro means the death of suse

JosipBroz,
YaST wouldn’t have to be “required”, but be ported over as an option. It doesn’t have to be the default option, but an option none the less.

Tunpishuang,
I would imagine with the porting of YaST to other distributions, they would mold it to worth with multiple backends. Although, I think zypper is more featureful then apt.

Andrea,
I should have mentioned that if they DID this move, they would have to seperate it from openSUSE and GPL it. I disagree that porting yast would be the death of SUSE. I think it would bring more attention to SUSE and possibly thought of the “Game Changers” that are coming up with these tools and others start porting them.

Yast is a nice config-tool. But there are other distributions with some of their tools being more user-friendly. A really bad thing about yast for every newbie is its name (something like “systemsettings” would fit better), and there is overlap with desktop-environment-systemsettings.

I voted pro, because more people would improve yast.

Bernd,

I am going to go on a whim here and say that you use KDE. I think the implementation of YaST in GNOME is made so it’s more of a single systemsettings type area, as KDE the system settings and yast configurations are quite split.

That’s an interesting point you make about the name though. People that don’t use SUSE, don’t know what a “yast” is.. or what its function is.

I voted no too. YaST is under GPL. If someone else wants it on other distributions, let him do the job. It should not be openSUSE problem.

Regards,
A.

I understand the no’s posted above, and disagree (Responses below)

YaST is a major reason I use OpenSUSE. Try using your favorite system tool without X, or even via a simple SSH session (with no X redirection). I can log in to my systems from SSH (on my iPhone, Windows, OSX, Linux, whatever) run yast in a `screen` session and rapidly configure/patch/whatever the system, from wherever I am. I challenge you to find any other single console system tool with that range of capability. Sure, with apt and vi I can accomplish the same thing, but not nearly as fast; and when time=money that matters.

JosipBroz: Why not have the option to use YaST on other platforms? Linux is about choice, why limit it? Further, the contention is not to replace your favorite, but just provide the choice to use it.

tunpishuang: YaST is not a simple package manager like `apt`. Yes there is a package manager component, but it also does hardware configurations, system configurations, service configurations, software package management, security/user management, and the list goes on. It is the “one-stop shop” for system admin.

I would LOVE YaST on RHEL! That would make life much easier, since YaST beats the config-* stuff hands down!

Yast okay, but only if it is possible to merge it into the kde4 systemsettings with an extra tab “yast” to fit in the look and feel with KDE4… but Sax2 no thanks, dont like that tool…

[...] Kevan took a look at YaST in the upcoming version of OpenSUSE. Ben also reckons that Emerald, the nifty tool which establishes nice translucency in [...]

If Yast was available for Ubuntu/Debian and Fedora/Centos, then it would make those distros more usable, especially when they don’t work “out of the box” (as they often do not on my hardware). Sax2, IMHO, has always been superior to anything else around for screen setup.

Cheers

I voted “who cares” but actually see I agree with people which said “no” or “yes”: I don’t care because I love YaST and use opensuse, of others want to use it I don’t think this changes the status-quo for suse users. Obviously, if they like to use it their’e welcome to do the work..